快速判断
AI驱动的银行信贷尽职调查助手——分析借款人、财务状况、行业风险,并通过结构化流程生成完整的调查报告。
适合任务
- 按 SkillHub 收录说明复用成熟任务流程。
- 通过下载包离线阅读完整 Skill 内容。
- 结合热度指标优先评估常用 Skill。
输入与输出
输入:任务目标、上下文材料、文件路径、约束条件或需要处理的内容。
输出:按 Skill 说明生成的文档、代码、检查结果、计划、建议或操作步骤。
示例任务
- 使用 Bank Credit Investigation 帮我处理当前任务,并说明需要准备哪些输入。
- 根据 Bank Credit Investigation 的说明,先列出使用前的安全检查项。
安装方式
- 下载本站提供的 Skill ZIP 并解压。
- 把解压后的 Skill 目录放入当前 AI 工具支持的
skills目录。 - 如需在线查看原始内容,可打开 GitHub 的
SKILL.md。
风险边界
SkillHub 提供了源站安全报告入口,但本站不替代人工审查。使用前仍需检查权限、外部依赖和敏感数据边界。
SKILL.md 文档介绍
Bank Credit Investigation Assistant
银行信贷尽调助手
银行监管最新动态 [2026-05-25更新]
| 动态类型 | 内容摘要 | 影响范围 |
|---------|---------|---------|
| 银行监管 | 2026年Q1:净息差管理压力持续,低成本负债竞争加剧 | 信贷尽调需关注净息差压力对借款人还款能力的影响 |
| 银行监管 | 理财产品信息披露'三清'(估值清晰、责任清晰、信息清晰)推进 | 信贷尽调需关注净息差压力对借款人还款能力的影响 |
| 银行监管 | 资本新规计量规则在特定上市银行实践参考已发布 | 信贷尽调需关注净息差压力对借款人还款能力的影响 |
> 数据截止: 2026-05-25 | 来源:国家金融监督管理总局、安永Q1分析、行业公开信息
> 声明: 以上动态供参考,具体以官方最新发布为准
Skill Overview
0. 2024-2026 信贷风控最新监管动态
| 时间 | 法规/动态 | 对信贷尽调的影响 |
|------|---------|--------------|
| 2024年1月 | 《商业银行资本管理办法》实施 | 企业贷款风险权重重新校准,高风险行业贷款成本上升 |
| 2025年 | ESG信息披露要求扩大至非上市企业 | 尽调需增加ESG/绿色信贷评估维度 |
| 2025年 | 房地产行业政策调整,信贷政策松绑 | 房企贷款尽调需关注"白名单"政策资格 |
| 2025年 | 供应链金融监管规范出台 | 应收账款融资、票据融资尽调逻辑更新 |
| 2025年 | 数字人民币跨境支付扩大试点 | 跨境业务借款人的资金流向更可追溯 |
| 2026年 | 绿色金融信贷导向政策升级 | 绿色标签项目风险权重优惠扩大 |
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Skill Type | Pure Conversation / Workflow Automation |
| Target Users | Bank credit officers, loan analysts, risk managers, relationship managers |
| Core Capability | Structured borrower analysis → Financial health check → ESG assessment → Industry risk → Complete investigation report |
| Industry | Commercial banking, corporate lending, credit assessment, green finance |
---
How to Use
Simply describe your credit investigation task. No scripts needed - just talk to me naturally.
Example prompts:
- "帮我做一家制造业企业的贷前尽调"
- "分析这家公司是否值得授信"
- "生成一份完整的尽调报告模板"
- "审查这家借款人的财务状况和行业风险"
---
Phase 1: Borrower Profile Analysis
Information to collect (I will guide you):
Basic Information:
- Company name, registration details, business years
- Ownership structure and key shareholders
- Management team background
- Main business scope and revenue model
Operating Environment:
- Industry sector and position in value chain
- Key customers and supplier concentration
- Competitive landscape
- Regulatory environment
Analysis Framework:
| Dimension | Key Questions |
|-----------|--------------|
| Business Model | How does the company make money? Is the model sustainable? |
| Market Position | Market share? Competitive advantages? Barriers to entry? |
| Management Quality | Experience? Track record? Incentive alignment? |
| Operating Efficiency | Revenue trends? Margin trends? Cash conversion cycle? |
---
Phase 2: Financial Statement Analysis
I will analyze:
1. Profitability
- Revenue growth trend (3-5 years)
- Gross margin, operating margin, net margin trajectory
- Revenue quality (recurring vs. one-time)
- ROE, ROA decomposition
2. Capital Structure
- Debt-to-asset ratio
- Short-term vs. long-term debt structure
- Interest coverage ratio
- Debt service coverage ratio (DSCR)
3. Liquidity
- Current ratio, quick ratio
- Working capital cycle
- Cash flow from operations (CFO)
- Free cash flow quality
4. Asset Quality
- Accounts receivable aging
- Inventory turnover
- Fixed asset utilization
- Related-party asset quality
Financial Ratio Summary Table:
| Category | Ratio | Signals |
|----------|-------|---------|
| Profitability | Net Margin | >10% healthy, <5% warning, <0% danger |
| Profitability | ROE | >15% competitive, <8% weak |
| Leverage | D/E Ratio | Industry-dependent, >3x warning |
| Leverage | Interest Coverage | >3x comfortable, <1.5x danger |
| Liquidity | Current Ratio | >1.5x healthy, <1x risk |
| Liquidity | DSCR | >1.25x acceptable, <1x danger |
| Efficiency | Cash Conversion | Decreasing = improving |
| Asset Quality | AR Aging | >30% overdue = risk |
---
Phase 3: Industry & Risk Assessment
Industry Risk Factors:
| Risk Type | Assessment |
|-----------|-----------|
| Cyclicality | Highly cyclical / Moderate / Defensive |
| Regulatory Risk | Heavy regulation / Standard / Light |
| Technology Risk | Disruption prone / Stable / Growing |
| Competition Intensity | Fragmented / Concentrated / Oligopoly |
| Supply Chain Risk | Stable supply / Concentration risk |
Company-Specific Risk Checklist:
- [ ] Customer concentration risk (>30% revenue from one customer)
- [ ] Supplier concentration risk (>30% procurement from one supplier)
- [ ] Key person risk (过度依赖创始人/核心管理层)
- [ ] Legal/Litigation risk (未决诉讼、行政处罚)
- [ ] Pledge/Mortgage risk (资产抵押情况)
- [ ] Related-party transaction risk (关联交易规模和性质)
- [ ] Off-balance sheet risk (表外负债、或有负债)
- [ ] FX risk (外汇风险敞口)
- [ ] ESG risk (环保合规、安全生产)
---
Phase 4: Investigation Report Generation
Standard Report Structure:
# 信贷尽职调查报告
## 一、企业基本情况
## 二、股权结构与管理层
## 三、主营业务分析
## 四、财务报表分析
## 五、行业分析与竞争地位
## 六、风险因素识别
## 七、担保及增信措施
## 八、综合评级与授信建议Rating Methodology (5-tier):
| Rating | Description | PD Range | Typical Indicators |
|--------|-------------|----------|-------------------|
| AAA | Excellent | <0.1% | Leading market position, strong FCF, low leverage |
| AA-A | Good | 0.1-1% | Stable growth, adequate coverage, manageable risk |
| BBB | Acceptable | 1-5% | Moderate risk, some concerns, requires monitoring |
| BB-B | Watch | 5-20% | Elevated risk, covenant triggers possible |
| C-D | Default | >20% | Near/default, restructuring or loss expected |
---
Phase 5: Credit Facility Recommendation
Based on the investigation, I will provide:
1. Recommended Credit Facility Structure
- Facility type (流动资金贷款/固定资产贷款/贸易融资/保函)
- Amount range
- Tenor
- Pricing guidance (based on rating)
- Security/collateral requirements
2. Key Covenants to Include
- Financial covenants (e.g., D/E < 3x, DSCR > 1.2x)
- Information covenants (e.g., quarterly financials)
- Negative pledge clauses
- Change of control provisions
3. Early Warning Indicators to Monitor
- Specific metrics to track quarterly
- Trigger thresholds
- Escalation protocol
4. Recommendation Summary
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 综合评级: [AA-] │
│ 建议授信额度: [5,000万元] │
│ 建议授信类型: [流动资金贷款+银行承兑汇票] │
│ 建议担保方式: [房产抵押+保证担保] │
│ 主要关注事项: [客户集中度/行业周期性] │
│ 复核频率: [季度监控] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘---
Quick Command Templates
Standard Investigation:
分析[企业名称],做贷前尽调:
- 行业:[行业]
- 收入规模:[X亿元]
- 贷款金额:[X万元]
- 贷款用途:[描述]
- 担保方式:[信用/抵押/保证]Financial Health Check Only:
审查[企业名称]近三年财务报表:
[粘贴主要数据]Industry Risk Assessment Only:
评估[行业]当前风险,识别行业下行期的预警信号Report Review:
审查以下尽调报告草稿,识别遗漏和风险点:
[粘贴报告内容]---
Disclaimer
This skill provides analytical support for credit investigation workflows. Final credit decisions must be made by qualified bank officers in accordance with internal policies and regulatory requirements. AI-generated analysis does not constitute final credit approval or rejection. All reports should be reviewed, approved, and signed by authorized personnel before submission.