快速判断
Expert AI auditor for FDA Food Safety (FSMA), HACCP, and PCQI compliance. Reviews food facility records and preventive controls.
适合任务
- 把重复任务整理成可复用的 AI 操作流程。
- 让 AI 在特定场景下按统一规范执行。
- 为团队或个人工作流提供可复制的任务说明。
输入与输出
输入:任务目标、上下文材料、文件路径、约束条件或需要处理的内容。
输出:按 Skill 说明生成的文档、代码、检查结果、计划、建议或操作步骤。
示例任务
- 使用 fda-food-safety-auditor 帮我处理当前任务,并说明执行前需要确认的输入。
- 根据 fda-food-safety-auditor 的说明,给我一个安全的使用步骤清单。
安装方式
- 下载本站提供的 Skill ZIP 并解压。
- 把解压后的 Skill 目录放入当前 AI 工具支持的
skills目录。 - 如需在线查看原始内容,可打开 GitHub 的
SKILL.md。
风险边界
使用前请检查权限、外部依赖和要处理的数据类型。不要把密码、密钥、身份信息或敏感客户资料交给未经确认的 Skill。
SKILL.md 文档介绍
FDA Food Safety Auditor
Overview
This skill transforms your AI assistant into a specialized FDA Food Safety Auditor. It is designed to review Food Safety Plans, HARPC (Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls) documentation, and HACCP plans against the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) standards.
When to Use This Skill
- Use when auditing a Food Safety Plan for a manufacturing or processing facility.
- Use when reviewing Supply Chain Program documentation for FSMA compliance.
- Use when preparing for a routine FDA food facility inspection.
- Use when evaluating corrective actions for a CCP (Critical Control Point) deviation.
How It Works
1. Activate the Skill: Mention @fda-food-safety-auditor and provide the document or record you wish to review.
2. Review: Provide your HACCP, Preventive Control, or Supplier Verification records.
3. Analyze: The AI identifies gaps — missing Critical Control Points (CCPs), inadequate monitoring parameters, or incomplete corrective action records.
4. Correction Guidance: Get specific, actionable fixes to close compliance gaps before an actual inspection.
Examples
Example 1: CCP Deviation Review
Scenario: A pasteurizer temperature dropped below the critical limit of 161°F for 30 seconds. The operator brought it back up and logged “fixed temperature.” No product was quarantined.
Finding:
FDA AUDIT FINDING
Severity: Major / Critical
Citation: 21 CFR 117.150 — Corrective Actions and Corrections
Analysis:
The deviation log is inadequate. Dropping below a critical limit means
the product may be unsafe. The operator failed to quarantine the affected
product and no formal root cause evaluation was documented.
Required Actions:
1. Place all product produced during the deviation window on hold.
2. Conduct a risk assessment to determine product disposition.
3. Document a formal Corrective Action identifying the root cause
(e.g., valve failure, calibration drift).
4. Verify the corrective action is effective before resuming production.Best Practices
- ✅ Do: Provide exact monitoring logs with temperatures, pH values, or times.
- ✅ Do: Use this skill to practice mock FDA inspections before the real thing.
- ❌ Don't: Assume SSOPs (Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures) satisfy the same requirements as process preventive controls.
- ❌ Don't: Close a CCP deviation without completing a full product disposition.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.