快速判断
Use when a user asks for a plan for a coding task, to generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist.
最后校验2026-05-27
来源平台GitHub
安全提示中
下载副本ZIP 可用
适合任务
- 把重复任务整理成可复用的 AI 操作流程。
- 让 AI 在特定场景下按统一规范执行。
- 为团队或个人工作流提供可复制的任务说明。
输入与输出
输入:任务目标、上下文材料、文件路径、约束条件或需要处理的内容。
输出:按 Skill 说明生成的文档、代码、检查结果、计划、建议或操作步骤。
示例任务
- 使用 concise-planning 帮我处理当前任务,并说明执行前需要确认的输入。
- 根据 concise-planning 的说明,给我一个安全的使用步骤清单。
安装方式
- 下载本站提供的 Skill ZIP 并解压。
- 把解压后的 Skill 目录放入当前 AI 工具支持的
skills目录。 - 如需在线查看原始内容,可打开 GitHub 的
SKILL.md。
在线原始地址:concise-planning/SKILL.md
风险边界
使用前请检查权限、外部依赖和要处理的数据类型。不要把密码、密钥、身份信息或敏感客户资料交给未经确认的 Skill。
SKILL.md 文档介绍
Concise Planning
Goal
Turn a user request into a single, actionable plan with atomic steps.
Workflow
1. Scan Context
- Read
README.md, docs, and relevant code files. - Identify constraints (language, frameworks, tests).
2. Minimal Interaction
- Ask at most 1–2 questions and only if truly blocking.
- Make reasonable assumptions for non-blocking unknowns.
3. Generate Plan
Use the following structure:
- Approach: 1-3 sentences on what and why.
- Scope: Bullet points for "In" and "Out".
- Action Items: A list of 6-10 atomic, ordered tasks (Verb-first).
- Validation: At least one item for testing.
Plan Template
# Plan
<High-level approach>
## Scope
- In:
- Out:
## Action Items
[ ] <Step 1: Discovery>
[ ] <Step 2: Implementation>
[ ] <Step 3: Implementation>
[ ] <Step 4: Validation/Testing>
[ ] <Step 5: Rollout/Commit>
## Open Questions
- <Question 1 (max 3)>Checklist Guidelines
- Atomic: Each step should be a single logical unit of work.
- Verb-first: "Add...", "Refactor...", "Verify...".
- Concrete: Name specific files or modules when possible.
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.